AI-Driven Detection, Prediction and Reduction of Investor Behavioural Biases in Financial Markets
Main Article Content
Keywords
artificial intelligence, behavioural finance, investor bias, machine learning, explainable AI
Abstract
Investor behavioural biases play an important role in financial markets, but their identification and prediction are difficult. While traditional methods including surveys, experiments and econometric proxies provide valuable insights, they are limited in terms of timeliness, scalability and predictive power. This paper reviews recent research on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods (machine learning, deep learning and reinforcement learning) in identifying investor behavioural biases. It examines how AI approaches are applied to identify and forecast overconfidence, loss aversion, anchoring, herding, the disposition effect, momentum and overreaction or underreaction in markets. The review concludes that AI methods are a better foundation for real-time and predictive behavioural analyses than conventional methods because they can detect nonlinear signals from trading records, financial text, social media and portfolio information. Random Forests, LSTMs, CNNs, graph-based learning and reinforcement learning are particularly helpful when investor behaviour is dynamic, diverse and hard to measure. At the same time, the review shows that AI does not solve behavioural-finance issues by itself: explainability, generalisation, privacy and the abuse of predicting investor biases are major challenges. So future research should integrate multiple data sources with explainable AI and additional ethical protections to ensure that AI-based tools help investors avoid their biases rather than predictably exploit them.
References
- [1]Ahmed, S., Alshater, M.M., Ammari, A.E. and Hammami, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101646.
- [2]Shalini Srivastav and Gupta, A. (2022). AI Application and Psychological Biases in Behavior Finance. ICCAKM 2022, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAKM54721.2022.9990393.
- [3]Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), pp. 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
- [4]Nkukpornu, E., Gyimah, P. and Sakyiwaa, L. (2020). Behavioural Finance and Investment Decisions: Does Behavioral Bias Matter? International Business Research, 13(11), p. 65. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v13n11p65.
- [5]Barberis, N. and Xiong, W. (2009). What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. Journal of Finance, 64(2), pp. 751-784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01448.x.
- [6]Hilary, G., Moeller, T. and Zhang, W. (2020). Anchoring and financial decision-making: Evidence from markets. Bayes Business School Working Paper. Available at: https://bayes.citystgeorges.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/79472/Hilary-et-al.pdf.
- [7]Singh, B., Kaunert, C. and Gautam, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Herding and Market Overreaction. In Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7827-4.ch001.
- [8]Ansh, R. (2023). Behavioral finance: Why does momentum work? A behavioural anomaly. Wright Research. Available at: https://www.wrightresearch.in/blog/why-does-momentum-work-a-behavioural-anomaly.
- [9]Gupta, S. and Rao, V.S. (2025). AI in Behavioral Finance: Understanding Investor Bias Through Machine Learning. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 5(2), pp. 5870-5880. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v5i2.3114.
- [10]Zhou, P. and Wu, L. (2024). Investor overreaction detection via convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing, 549, pp. 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.03.012.
- [11]Li, H., Zhao, Y. and Huang, X. (2023). Reinforcement learning for investment strategy adjusting to behavioral biases. Artificial Intelligence in Finance, 12(3), pp. 45-60.
- [12]Zhang, Z., Wei, D., Varshney, K.R., Dhurandhar, A. and Tomsett, R. (2022). Deciding fast and slow: The role of cognitive biases in AI-assisted decision-making. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.07938.
- [13]Khuntia, R., Ingle, A.S., Manna, R., Srivastava, A.K. and Dwivedi, K. (2025). Decoding Consumer Financial Behavior: AI Applications in Behavioral Finance. Advances in Consumer Research, 2(3), pp. 725-732.
- [14]Liaudinskas, K. (2022). Human vs. machine: Disposition effect among algorithmic and human day traders. Barcelona School of Economics Working Paper No. 1133. Available at: https://bse.eu/sites/default/files/working_paper_pdfs/1133.pdf.
- [15]Saltık, Ö., Rehman, W.U., Söyü, R. and Şengönül, A. (2023). Predicting loss aversion behavior with machine-learning methods. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 161. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01620-2.
- [16]Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S. and Guestrin, C. (2016). 'Why should I trust you?': Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135-1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778.
- [17]Lundberg, S.M. and Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, pp. 4765-4774.
