The Impact of ESG Screening on Risk-Adjusted Returns: Evidence from U.S. Equity ETFs

Main Article Content

Yanzhu Tao

Keywords

environmental, social, and corporate governance screening (ESG), risk-adjusted returns, exchange-traded funds, sustainable investing

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of ESG ratings on the risk-adjusted performance of U.S. exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Specifically, it compares the iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) to examine whether an ESG-focused investment strategy can achieve superior financial outcomes relative to traditional market investing. Using daily data from 2017 to 2024, the study employs descriptive statistical analysis, comparative performance metrics, correlation analysis, and paired sample t-tests to evaluate differences in performance, volatility, and risk-adjusted returns between the two ETFs. Empirical results indicate that ESGU exhibits a slightly higher average return than IVV; however, this difference is economically small and statistically insignificant. From a risk perspective, ESGU shows marginally higher volatility, suggesting that ESG screening does not necessarily reduce overall market risk exposure. ESGU’s Sharpe ratio is slightly higher, indicating a modest improvement in return per unit of risk, although this advantage is also not statistically significant. Overall, the findings suggest that ESG screening does not meaningfully enhance or reduce investment performance in the U.S. equity ETF market. This study contributes to the literature by providing updated empirical evidence on ESG screening effectiveness in passive investment strategies and assessing whether ESG-focused ETFs can deliver competitive risk-adjusted returns compared to traditional benchmarks. The results offer practical implications for investors seeking to balance financial performance with sustainability objectives.

Abstract 30 | PDF Downloads 9

References

  • [1]Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.
  • [2]Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724.
  • [3]Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.
  • [4]Giese, G., Lee, L.-E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69–83.
  • [5]Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824.
  • [6]Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–83.
  • [7]Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63.
  • [8]Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 30–39.
  • [9]Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–322.
  • [10]Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180–193.