Supply-Chain Perturbations and Multi-Platform Robustness in Honey Authentication: Implications for Emerging New Zealand Monofloral Honeys

Main Article Content

Yaoyang Wu
Auckland University of Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70267/shbe.2026202212

Keywords

honey authentication, New Zealand monofloral honey, non -mānuka honey, supply -chain perturbations, data, fusion, external validation

Abstract

New Zealand monofloral honeys beyond mānuka, including rewarewa and kāmahi, require authentication systems that remain reliable under realistic supply -chain conditions rather than under idealized laboratory settings alone. This review evaluates how three c ategories of supply-chain perturbation affect authentication- relevant chemical markers. Thermal processing alters volatile and phenolic domains in a marker -specific manner while leaving trace elements comparatively stable. Filtration and ultrafiltration se lectively remove pollen and certain non-volatile markers, although the evidence base for ultrafiltration-specific effects remains limited. Syrup adulteration distorts elemental ratios and can be detected through targeted small -molecule markers, but discriminatory power may weaken during post -adulteration storage. A comparative assessment of four analytical platform categories (GC-MS, LC-MS/MS, ICP-MS, and rapid spectroscopic methods) shows that each carries a distinct vulnerability profile and that no single platform provides uniform robustness across all perturbation types. On this basis, this review proposes a Sentinel Stress -Testing Framework for future authentication claims, comprising perturbation -aware challenge tiers, mandatory external validation on independent sample sets, and multi -block data fusion to exploit cross -platform redundancy. This framework provides a transferable basis for future commercial.

Abstract 31 | PDF Downloads 25

References

  • [1] European Commission, ‘EU coordinated action “From the Hives” (Honey 2021-2022)’, 2022. Accessed: Mar. 09, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety/eu-agri-food-fraud-network/eu- coordinated-actions/honey-2021-2022_en
  • [2] Directive (EU) 2024/1438 of the European parliament and of the council of 14 may 2024 amending council directives 2001/110/EC relating to honey, 2001/112/EC relating to fruit juices and certain similar products intended for human consumption, 2001/113/EC r elating to fruit jams, jellies and marmalades and sweetened chestnut puré e intended for human consumption, and 2001/114/EC relating to certain partly or wholly dehydrated preserved milk for human consumption . 2024. Accessed: Mar. 09, 2026. [Online]. Available: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1438/oj
  • [3] New Zealand Food Safety, ‘Scientific interpretive summary and peer review summary of the reassessment of the scientific basis of the regulatory export definition for mānuka honey’, New Zealand Food Safety, Jun. 2023.
  • [4] C. Zucchetta, W. Tangohau, A. McCallion, D. J. Hardy, and A. Clavijo McCormick, ‘Exploring the chemical properties and biological activity of four new zealand monofloral honeys to support the māori vision and aspirations’, Molecules, vol. 27, no. 10, p. 3282, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/molecules27103282.
  • [5] S. Soares, J. S. Amaral, M. B. P. P. Oliveira, and I. Mafra, ‘A comprehensive review on the main honey authentication issues: production and origin’, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1072– 1100, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12278.
  • [6] A. Agila and S. Barringer, ‘Effect of adulteration versus storage on volatiles in unifloral honeys from different floral sources and locations’, J. Food Sci., 2013, doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12033.
  • [7] F. Wu et al., ‘Effect of processing steps on phenolic profile of rape honey (brassica napus) using HPLC - ECD’, LWT, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114183.
  • [8] S. Yan, X. Wang, Y. Wu, K. Wang, J. Shan, and X. Xue, ‘A metabolomics approach revealed an amadori compound distinguishes artificially heated and naturally matured acacia honey’, Food Chem., 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132631.
  • [9] N. Czipa, C. Phillips, and B. Kovács, ‘Composition of acacia honeys following processing, storage and adulteration’, J. Food Sci. Technol., 2019, doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-03587-y.
  • [10] R. S. Barhate, R. Subramanian, K. E. Nandini, and H. Umesh Hebbar, ‘Processing of honey using polymeric microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes’, J. Food Eng. , vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 49 –54, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00017-7.
  • [11] S. Trautvetter, I. Kö lling-speer, G. Beckh, and K. Speer, ‘Effect of ultrafiltration on marker substances in honey dew honeys’, 2006.
  • [12] A. I. Cabañero, J. L. Recio, and M. Rupérez, ‘Liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry: a new perspective on honey adulteration detection’, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 54, no. 26, pp. 9719–9727, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1021/jf062067x.
  • [13] M. Gajek, K. Moj, P. Wysocki, E. Kuśmierek, and M. I. Szynkowska -Jóźwik, ‘Analysis of changes in selected physicochemical parameters and elemental composition of honey as a result of adulteration with sugar additives’, Foods Basel Switz., 2026, doi: 10.3390/foods15030562.
  • [14] L. Elflein and K. -P. Raezke, ‘Improved detection of honey adulteration by measuring differences between13 C/12 C stable carbon isotope ratios of protein and sugar compounds with a combination of elemental analyzer - isotope ratio mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography - isotope ratio mass spectrometry (δ 13 C - EA/LC-IRMS)’, Apidologie, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 574 –587, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1051/apido:2008042.
  • [15] X. Xue et al., ‘2-acetylfuran-3-glucopyranoside as a novel marker for the detection of honey adulterated with rice syrup’, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 61, no. 31, pp. 7488–7493, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1021/jf401912u.
  • [16] M. Martinello, R. Stella, A. Baggio, G. Biancotto, and F. Mutinelli, ‘LC -HRMS-based non -targeted metabolomics for the assessment of honey adulteration with sugar syrups: a preliminary study’, Metabolites, 2022, doi: 10.3390/metabo12100985.
  • [17] V. Paiano et al., ‘Detection of Honey Adulteration by Liquid Chromatography —High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry: Results from an EU Coordinated Action’, Separations, vol. 12, no. 2, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/separations12020047.
  • [18] A. Rust, F. Marini, M. Allsopp, P. J. Williams, and M. Manley, ‘Application of ANOVA -simultaneous component analysis to quantify and characterise effects of age, temperature, syrup adulteration and irradiation on near-infrared (NIR) spectral data of honey’, Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., vol. 253, p. 119546, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119546.
  • [19] Y. Kato et al., ‘Methylglyoxal binds to amines in honey matrix and 2’-methoxyacetophenone is released in gaseous form into the headspace on the heating of manuka honey’, Food Chem. , 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127789.
  • [20] I. Escriche, M. Kadar, M. Juan-Borrás, and E. Doménech, ‘Suitability of antioxidant capacity, flavonoids and phenolic acids for floral authentication of honey. Impact of industrial thermal treatment’, Food Chem., 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.033.
  • [21] L. Tian et al. , ‘Impact of processing steps (filtration, creaming and pasteurization) on the botanical classification of honey using LC-QTOF-MS’, Food Res. Int., 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114841.
  • [22] C. Egido, J. Saurina, S. Sentellas, and O. Núñez, ‘Honey fraud detection based on sugar syrup adulterations by HPLC -UV fingerprinting and chemometrics’, Food Chem. , 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137758.
  • [23] F. Huang et al. , ‘Detection of adulteration in chinese honey using NIR and ATR -FTIR spectral data fusion’, Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. , vol. 235, p. 118297, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.118297.
  • [24] E. Geană, R. Isopescu, C. Ciucure, C. Gijiu, and A. Joșceanu, ‘Honey adulteration detection via ultraviolet–visible spectral investigation coupled with chemometric analysis’, Foods Basel Switz., 2024, doi: 10.3390/foods13223630.
  • [25] X. Yang, P. Guang, G. Xu, S. Zhu, Z. Chen, and F. Huang, ‘Manuka honey adulteration detection based on near-infrared spectroscopy combined with aquaphotomics’, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109837.
  • [26] S. Yan and X. Xue, ‘Volatile metabolomic analysis reveals terpenoid differences between naturally matured and artificially heated acacia honey’, Food Chem. X , vol. 31, p. 103167, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.103167.
  • [27] W. Vera, R. Salvador -Reyes, G. Quispe -Santivañez, and G. Kemper, ‘Detection of adulterants in powdered foods using near -infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics: recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives’, Foods, vol. 14, no. 18, p. 3195, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3390/foods14183195.
  • [28] I. M. Scott et al., ‘Merits of random forests emerge in evaluation of chemometric classifiers by external validation’, Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 801, pp. 22–33, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.09.027.
  • [29] Y. Hong et al., ‘Data fusion and multivariate analysis for food authenticity analysis’, Nat. Commun., vol. 14, p. 3309, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38382-z.

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published
Aug 11, 2026
Conference Proceedings Volume
Vol. 18 (2026): Proceedings of 2026 International Conference on Smart Healthcare and Biomedical Engineering (ICSHBE 2026)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Wu, Yaoyang. “Supply-Chain Perturbations and Multi-Platform Robustness in Honey Authentication: Implications for Emerging New Zealand Monofloral Honeys”. Exploring Science Academic Conference Series, vol. 18, Aug. 2026, pp. 202-1, https://doi.org/10.70267/shbe.2026202212.