Sensorimotor Closed-Loop Control in Post-Stroke Wrist-Hand Rehabilitation Robots: A Structured Narrative Review

Main Article Content

Shengwei Chai

Keywords

post-stroke rehabilitation, wrist-hand robot, sensorimotor integration, voluntary motor effort recognition, telerehabilitation

Abstract

Post-stroke wrist-hand rehabilitation robots can increase training intensity, repetition, and measurement. Still, systems centered mainly on mechanical assistance may not fully address the sensorimotor impairments that constrain functional recovery. This structured narrative review examines how sensorimotor closed-loop control may reshape wrist-hand robotic rehabilitation by linking somatosensory feedback, voluntary motor effort recognition, and home-based translation. The review was informed by a PubMed-based literature pool and organized around three interrelated themes rather than a meta-analytic effect estimate. Current evidence suggests that proprioceptive, tactile, vibrotactile, and electro-vibro-feedback strategies may support sensorimotor integration. At the same time, EMG-, EEG/BCI-, and CMC-informed approaches can help detect residual motor intention or effort and trigger robotic, FES, or NMES assistance. Home-based and telerehabilitation systems also show potential to improve access, training dose, and therapist-supported monitoring. However, the evidence remains heterogeneous, often limited by small samples, pilot designs, mixed devices, and incomplete validation of long-term home use. Future wrist-hand systems should integrate somatosensory feedba ck, voluntary effort recognition, adaptive robotic/FES/NMES assistance, objective neurophysiological and kinematic assessment, home monitoring, and therapist-in-the-loop supervision, while avoiding claims of clinical superiority before stronger controlled evidence is available.

Abstract 32 | PDF Downloads 24

References

  • [1] Doumas I, Everard G, Dehem S, Lejeune T. Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a meta-analysis. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2021;18:100. doi:10.1186/s12984-021-00889-1. PMID:34130713.
  • [2] Liu LY, Li Y, Lamontagne A. The effects of error-augmentation versus error-reduction paradigms in robotic therapy to enhance upper extremity performance and recovery post-stroke: a systematic review. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2018;15:65. doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0408-5. PMID:29973250.
  • [3] Seo NJ, Ramakrishnan V, Woodbury ML, Bonilha L, Finetto C, Schranz C, Scronce G, Coupland K, Blaschke J, Baker A, Howard K, Meinzer C, Velozo CA, Adams RJ. Concomitant sensory stimulation during therapy to enhance hand functional recovery post stroke. Trials. 2022;23:262. doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06241-9. PMID:35382902.
  • [4] Tsai MF, Wang RH, Zariffa J. Validity of Novel Outcome Measures for Hand Function Performance After Stroke Using Egocentric Video. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2023;37(2-3):142-150. doi:10.1177/15459683231159663. PMID:36912468.
  • [5] Gu Y, Xu Y, Shen Y, Huang H, Liu T, Jin L, Ren H, Wang J. A Review of Hand Function Rehabilitation Systems Based on Hand Motion Recognition Devices and Artificial Intelligence. Brain sciences. 2022;12:1079. doi:10.3390/brainsci12081079. PMID:36009142.
  • [6] Tseng KC, Wang L, Hsieh C, Wong AM. Portable robots for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of medicine. 2024;56(1):2337735. doi:10.1080/07853890.2024.2337735. PMID:38640459.
  • [7] Fardipour S, Hadadi M. Investigation of therapeutic effects of wearable robotic gloves on improving hand function in stroke patients: A systematic review. Current journal of neurology. 2022;21(2):125-132. doi:10.18502/cjn.v21i2.10496. PMID:38011474.
  • [8] Cordo P, Wolf S, Rymer WZ, Byl N, Stanek K, Hayes JR. Assisted Movement With Proprioceptive Stimulation Augments Recovery From Moderate-To-Severe Upper Limb Impairment During Subacute Stroke Period: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurorehabilitation and neur al repair. 2022;36(3):239-250. doi:10.1177/15459683211063159. PMID:35067125.
  • [9] Murakami Y, Honaga K, Kono H, Haruyama K, Yamaguchi T, Tani M, Isayama R, Takakura T, Tanuma A, Hatori K, Wada F, Fujiwara T. New Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Electromyography-Driven Robot Hand for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2023;37(5):298-306. doi:10.1177/15459683231166939. PMID:37039319.
  • [10] Wolf SL, Sahu K, Bay RC, Buchanan S, Reiss A, Linder S, Rosenfeldt A, Alberts J. The HAAPI (Home Arm Assistance Progression Initiative) Trial: A Novel Robotics Delivery Approach in Stroke Rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2015;29(10):9 58-968. doi:10.1177/1545968315575612. PMID:25782693.
  • [11] Gassert R, Dietz V. Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2018;15:46 . doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0383-x. PMID:29866106.
  • [12] Bai J, Zhu R, Jiang Y, Du X. Robot-Assisted Dynamic Interaction of Hemiplegic Upper Limbs with Complex Objects Based on Enhanced Feedforward-Impedance Control. Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland). 2025;10:815. doi:10.3390/biomimetics10120815. PMID:41439883.
  • [13] Ben Abdallah I, Bouteraa Y, Alotaibi A. AI-driven hybrid rehabilitation: synergizing robotics and electrical stimulation for upper-limb recovery after stroke. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology. 2025;13:1619247. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1619247. PMID:40635696.
  • [14] Bhagat NA, French J, Venkatakrishnan A, Yozbatiran N, Francisco GE, O'Malley MK, Contreras-Vidal JL. Detecting movement intent from scalp EEG in a novel upper limb robotic rehabilitation system for stroke. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference. 2014;2014:4127-4130. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944532. PMID:25570900.
  • [15] Lin L, Huang Y, Qing W, Kuet MT, Zhao H, Ye F, Rong W, Li W, Hu X. Sensorimotor Integration by Targeted Priming in Muscles with Electromyography-Driven Electro-vibro-feedback in Robot-Assisted Wrist/Hand Rehabilitation after Stroke. Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.). 2026; 7:0507. doi:10.34133/cbsystems.0507. PMID:41608594.
  • [16] Guo Z, Zhou S, Ji K, Zhuang Y, Song J, Nam C, Hu X, Zheng Y. Corticomuscular integrated representation of voluntary motor effort in robotic control for wrist-hand rehabilitation after stroke. Journal of neural engineering. 2022;19:026004. doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac5757. PMID:35193124.
  • [17] Nam C, Zhang B, Chow T, Ye F, Huang Y, Guo Z, Li W, Rong W, Hu X, Poon W. Home-based self-help telerehabilitation of the upper limb assisted by an electromyography-driven wrist/hand exoneuromusculoskeleton after stroke. Journal of neuroengineering and reh abilitation. 2021;18:137 . doi:10.1186/s12984-021-00930-3. PMID:34526058.
  • [18] Remsik AB, van Kan PLE, Gloe S, Gjini K, Williams L Jr, Nair V, Caldera K, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2022;16:725715. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.725715. PMID:35874158.
  • [19] Zhang W, Lai J, Xu B, Zeng H, Wu T, Hu H, Song A. The Role of Vibrotactile Stimulation in Soft Rehabilitation Glove-Assisted Hand Rehabilitation Training: A Pilot Study. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of t he IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2026;34:149-162. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3639490. PMID:41329575.
  • [20] Hoh JE, Scott SH, Dukelow SP, Semrau JA. Proprioceptive Thresholds Are Indicators of Upper Limb Perception After Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2025;39(11):931-944. doi:10.1177/15459683251363245. PMID:40842407.
  • [21] Bustamante C, Brevis F, Canales S, Milló n S, Pascual R. Effect of functional electrical stimulation on the proprioception, motor function of the paretic upper limb, and patient quality of life: A case report. Journal of hand therapy: official journal of t he American Society of Hand Therapists. 2016;29:507-514. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2016.06.012. PMID:27665394.
  • [22] Du Q, Luo J, Cheng Q, Wang Y, Guo S. Vibrotactile enhancement in hand rehabilitation has a reinforcing effect on sensorimotor brain activities. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2022;16:935827. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.935827. PMID:36267238.
  • [23] Elangovan N, Yeh IL, Holst-Wolf J, Konczak J. A robot-assisted sensorimotor training program can improve proprioception and motor function in stroke survivors. IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]. 2019;2019:660-664. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779409. PMID:31374706.
  • [24] Ingemanson ML, Rowe JR, Chan V, Wolbrecht ET, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC. Somatosensory system integrity explains differences in treatment response after stroke. Neurology. 2019;92(10):e1098-e1108. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007041. PMID:30728310.
  • [25] Tashiro S, Mizuno K, Kawakami M, Takahashi O, Nakamura T, Suda M, Haruyama K, Otaka Y, Tsuji T, Liu M. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation-enhanced rehabilitation is associated with not only motor but also somatosensory cortical plasticity in chronic stroke patients: an interventional study. Therapeutic advances in chronic disease. 2019;10:1-13. doi:10.1177/2040622319889259. PMID:31798821.
  • [26] He J, Yuan Z, Quan L, Xi H, Guo J, Zhu D, Chen M, Yang B, Cui Z, Zhu S, Qiao J. Multimodal assessment of a BCI system for stroke rehabilitation integrating motor imagery and motor attempts: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of neuroengineering and reh abilitation. 2025;22:185. doi:10.1186/s12984-025-01723-8. PMID:40859358.
  • [27] Pichiorri F, Toppi J, de Seta V, Colamarino E, Masciullo M, Tamburella F, Lorusso M, Cincotti F, Mattia D. Exploring high-density corticomuscular networks after stroke to enable a hybrid Brain-Computer Interface for hand motor rehabilitation. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2023;20:5. doi:10.1186/s12984-023-01127-6. PMID:36639665.
  • [28] Mashayekhi M, Moghaddam MM. EMG-driven fatigue-based self-adapting admittance control of a hand rehabilitation robot. Journal of Biomechanics. 2022;138:111104. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111104. PMID:35561557.
  • [29] Ambrosini E, Gasperini G, Zajc J, Immick N, Augsten A, Rossini M, Ballarati R, Russold M, Ferrante S, Ferrigno G, Bulgheroni M, Baccinelli W, Schauer T, Wiesener C, Gfoehler M, Puchinger M, Weber M, Weber S, Pedrocchi A, Molteni F, Krakow K. A Robotic System with EMG-Triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Arm Functions in Stroke Survivors. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2021;35(4):334-345. doi:10.1177/1545968321997769. PMID:33655789.
  • [30] Frolov AA, Mokienko O, Lyukmanov R, Biryukova E, Kotov S, Turbina L, Nadareyshvily G, Bushkova Y. Post-stroke Rehabilitation Training with a Motor-Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Controlled Hand Exoskeleton: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2017;11:400. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00400. PMID:28775677.
  • [31] Cantillo-Negrete J, Rodrí guez-Garcí a ME, Carrillo-Mora P, Arias-Carrió n O, Ortega-Robles E, Galicia-Alvarado MA, Valdé s-Cristerna R, Ramirez-Nava AG, Hernandez-Arenas C, Quinzañ os-Fresnedo J, Pacheco-Gallegos MDR, Marí n-Arriaga N, Carino-Escobar RI. The ReHand-BCI trial: a randomized controlled trial of a brain-computer interface for upper extremity stroke neurorehabilitation. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2025;19:1579988. doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1579988. PMID:40606836.
  • [32] Guo L, Wang J, Wu Q, Li X, Zhang B, Zhou L, Xiong D. Clinical Study of a Wearable Remote Rehabilitation Training System for Patients With Stroke: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2023;11:e40416. doi:10.2196/40416. PMID:36821348.
  • [33] Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, Lannin NA, George S, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020;(1):CD010255. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3. PMID:32002991.
  • [34] Li L, Fu Q, Tyson S, Preston N, Weightman A. A scoping review of design requirements for a home-based upper limb rehabilitation robot for stroke. Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 2022;29(6):449-463. doi:10.1080/10749357.2021.1943797. PMID:34281494.
  • [35] Proulx CE, Higgins J, Vaughan T, Hewko M, Gagnon DH. Poststroke Neurorehabilitation Using a Soft Robotic Glove Combined With a Virtual Environment: Preliminary Study on Feasibility, Safety, Effects, and User Satisfaction. JMIR neurotechnology. 2025;4:e69750. doi:10.2196/69750. PMID:41341419.
  • [36] De Bartolo D, De Pasquale P, Russo M, Berger DJ, Maselli A, Borzelli D, Nissler C, Nowak M, Castellini C, Morone G, d'Avella A. Usability, Acceptability, and Feasibility of a Personalized Adaptive Mirror Therapy for Upper-Limb Poststroke Rehabilitation Using Immersive Virtual Reality and Myoelectric Control: Single-Arm Pre-Post Study. JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technolog ies. 2026;13:e81894. doi:10.2196/81894. PMID:42082173.
  • [37] Proietti T, Nuckols K, Grupper J, Schwerz de Lucena D, Inirio B, Porazinski K, Wagner D, Cole T, Glover C, Mendelowitz S, Herman M, Breen J, Lin D, Walsh C. Combining soft robotics and telerehabilitation for improving motor function after stroke. Wearable technologies. 2024;5:e1. doi:10.1017/wtc.2023.26. PMID:38510985.
  • [38] Kilbride C, Scott DJM, Butcher T, Norris M, Warland A, Anokye N, Cassidy E, Baker K, Athanasiou DA, Singla-Buxarrais G, Nowicky A, Ryan J. Safety, feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of the Neurofenix platform for Rehabilitation via HOMe Based gaming exercise for the Upper-limb post Stroke (RHOMBUS): results of a feasibility intervention study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e052555. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052555. PMID:35228279.
  • [39] Zondervan DK, Friedman N, Chang E, Zhao X, Augsburger R, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC. Home-based hand rehabilitation after chronic stroke: Randomized, controlled single-blind trial comparing the MusicGlove with a conventional exercise program. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 2016;53(4):457-472. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2015.04.0057. PMID:27532880.