The Impact of Financial Shared Services on Stock Price Synchronicity

Main Article Content

Xiaoyue Xu

Keywords

financial shared services, stock price synchronicity, accounting information comparability

Abstract

With the deep integration of digital economy and financial transformation, the construction of enterprise Financial Shared Service Center has entered a period of rapid development. This study selects the Shanghai-Shenzhen A-share listed companies in China from 2021-2025 as a sample, analyzes the impact of financial shared services on the synchronization of enterprise stock prices, and further examines the transmission mechanism of accounting information comparability between financial shared services and stock price synchronization. The results show that the establishment of financial shared services centers by enterprises has significantly reduced the synchronization of stock prices; Accounting information comparability exhibits a weak masking effect on stock price synchronicity, but the role of financial shared services in directly reducing the synchronization of stock prices still dominates; In non-state-owned enterprises and large-scale enterprises, the inhibition of stock price synchronization by financial shared services is more obvious. The research of this study will help enterprises understand the specific impact on pricing efficiency when promoting financial shared services, and also provide reference for investors' rational decision-making and regulatory departments to improve capital market information governance.

Abstract 36 | PDF Downloads 12

References

  • [1] Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 215–260.
  • [2] Qian, A., Xiao, Y., & Wu, C. (2024). Can state-appointed directors improve information asymmetry in private enterprises? Journal of Financial Research, (8), 132–149.
  • [3] Jiang, S. (2022). Exploring the deep integration of finance and business based on financial shared services. Friends of Accounting, (1), 2–9.
  • [4] Chen, Y. (2024). Research on digital internal control based on an intelligent Financial Shared Service Center: Evidence from Tailong Co., Ltd. Communication of Finance and Accounting, (18), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.2024.18.027
  • [5] Jiang, Y. (2022). The establishment of Financial Shared Service Centers and the improvement of accounting information transparency. On Economic Problems, (10), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2022.10.002
  • [6] You, J., Zhang, J., & Jiang, W. (2007). Institutional development, firm-specific information, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from the R² perspective. China Economic Quarterly, (1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2007.01.018
  • [7] Zhao, Y. (2025). How do state-owned shareholders reduce stock price synchronicity in private enterprises? Research on Financial and Economic Issues, (9), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.09.004
  • [8] Li, X., Lou, Y., Wang, R., et al. (2025). How do institutional investors facilitate reporting comparability? Evidence from common institutional ownership in the United States. Contemporary Accounting Research, 42(2), 1176–1211.
  • [9] Zhang, W., & Li, Z. (2022). Internal control quality, accounting information comparability, and stock price synchronicity. Commercial Accounting, (16), 88–92.
  • [10] Durnev, A., Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zarowin, P. (2003). Does greater firm-specific return variation mean more or less informed stock pricing? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5), 797–836.
  • [11] De Franco, G., Kothari, S. P., & Verdi, R. S. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 895–931.
  • [12] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
  • [13] Wen, Z., & Ye, B. (2014). Mediation effect analysis: Advances in methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5), 731–745.
  • [14] Meng, S., & Wang, Q. (2023). Measuring implicit government guarantees: A literature review. The Journal of World Economy, 46(2), 209–240. https://doi.org/10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2023.02.009
  • [15] Wang, H., Yan, Z., Guo, G., et al. (2023). Digital infrastructure policy and enterprise digital transformation: Empowerment or burden? The Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 40(5), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2023.03.14.002