The Impact of Digital Payment Development on Financing Constraints of Micro and Small Enterprises: An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Data

Main Article Content

Tonghui Liu

Keywords

digital payment, micro and small enterprises, financing constraints, alternative credit scoring, financial inclusion

Abstract

Access to formal financing remains a critical barrier for micro and small enterprises (MSEs) in China, particularly for underserved segments such as young firms and those in less developed regions. Traditional lending models often struggle to assess creditworthiness due to information asymmetry and the lack of verifiable financial records. This study examines whether digital payment adoption can alleviate these financing constraints. Leveraging a unique matched dataset that combines digital payment records from a major fintech platform with bank loan applications, we analyze a panel of over 10,000 MSEs across 30 Chinese provinces from 2019 to 2023. We measure digital payment intensity through frequency, transaction volume, and usage consistency, and evaluate its effects on loan approval rates and borrowing costs. Our findings indicate that intensive digital payment use significantly improves MSEs' access to credit and reduces their financing costs. These benefits are disproportionately concentrated among young firms and enterprises located in less economically developed regions. Mechanism analysis reveals that digital payment data mitigates information asymmetry by generating real-time, verifiable signals of business health and operational stability. These results provide robust micro-level evidence on fintech's potential to advance inclusive finance. They offer practical implications for policymakers seeking to reduce financing disparities and for financial institutions aiming to refine credit assessment frameworks for underserved MSEs.

Abstract 22 | PDF Downloads 10

References

  • [1]OECD's Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2016: An OECD Scoreboard, with data cited from China's National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) 2010 data.
  • [2]Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2016). Formal versus informal finance: Evidence from China. Review of Financial Studies, 23(8), 3048–3097.
  • [3]Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.
  • [4]Huang, Y. (2018). The Rise of Digital Finance in China: A Leapfrogging Perspective.
  • [5]Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. World Bank.
  • [6]Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., & Puri, M. (2022). On the rise of fintechs: Credit scoring using digital footprints. Review of Financial Studies, 35(10), 4551–4593.
  • [7]Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393-410.
  • [8]Understanding the financing of small and medium-sized enterprises in China. The World Bank Economic Review, 30(suppl_1), S13-S20.
  • [9]Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931-2943.
  • [10]On the rise of fintechs: Credit scoring using digital footprints. The Review of Financial Studies, 35(9), 4095-4139.
  • [11]The roles of alternative data and machine learning in fintech lending: Evidence from the LendingClub consumer platform. Financial Management, 48(4), 1009-1029.
  • [12]The impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(1), 62-70.
  • [13]The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. The World Bank.