Research on Computer Vehicle Inspection and Its Impact on Urban Traffic Intelligence
Main Article Content
Keywords
YOLO, vehicle detection, urban traffic intelligence, sensor fusion, computer vision
Abstract
With the acceleration of urbanization, urban traffic faces multiple challenges such as congestion and safety, accompanied by an explosive growth of traffic data. Promoting the intelligent development of urban transportation is of vital theoretical and practical value for improving traffic efficiency and travel experience. This paper adopts a literature review methodology to outline the technological shift from traditional machine learning classifiers to deep learning paradigms in vehicle detection. Traditional vehicle detection relying on SVM and Decision Trees suffers from manual feature extraction and severe operational bloat, yielding sluggish processing speeds that fail modern real-time demands. Conversely, the deep learning paradigm, led by YOLO, treats detection as a single regression problem to drastically enhance speed and accuracy. For comprehensive tracking, integrating YOLO with ByteTrack ensures continuous vehicle identification and precise lane occupancy analysis, while combining it with LSTM networks enables predicting traffic flow two hours in advance for dynamic signal control. To overcome optical limitations in extreme environments, multi-modal sensor fusion (combining YOLO with LiDAR/RADAR) and decentralized edge computing are reshaping smart city infrastructure. This evolutionary trajectory shifts urban mobility toward predictive governance, highlighting future needs for lightweight edge optimization, all-weather fusion, and model interpretability.
References
- [1]Number of registered vehicles (no date) CEIC. Available at: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/number-of-registered-vehicles (Accessed: 10 May 2026).
- [2]Zheng, L.-W., Chang, Y.-H. and Li, Z.-Z. (2010) ‘A study of 3D feature tracking and localization using a stereo vision system’, 2010 International Computer Symposium (ICS2010), pp. 402–407. doi:10.1109/compsym.2010.5685479.
- [3]Llorca, D.F. et al. (2010) Vision-based traffic data collection sensor for Automotive Applications, MDPI. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/10/1/860 (Accessed: 10 May 2026).
- [4]Encío, L. et al. (2025) ‘Enhanced Nighttime Vehicle Detection for on-board processing’, IEEE Access, 13, pp. 44817–44835. doi:10.1109/access.2025.3548837.
- [5]Wu, B. and Wang, X. (2026) ‘Research on urban traffic flow detection and forecasting based on Yolo Model and LSTM’, Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 15(3), pp. 6–8. doi:10.54097/8wmzb464.
- [6]Xu, Y. et al. (2016) A hybrid vehicle detection method based on viola-jones and hog + SVM from UAV images, MDPI. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/s16081325 (Accessed: 10 May 2026).
- [7]Ying, K. et al. (2015) ‘Decision tree-based machine learning algorithm for in-node vehicle classification’, 2015 IEEE Green Energy and Systems Conference (IGESC), pp. 71–76. doi:10.1109/igesc.2015.7359454.
- [8]Sharma, D.K., Pradhan, R. and Agrawal, R. (2022) ‘Comparative study on real-time vehicle classification’, 2022 11th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), pp. 433–437. doi:10.1109/smart55829.2022.10046885.
- [9]Doria Usta, D. et al. (2025) ‘Intelligent Traffic Management: Comparative Evaluation of yolov3, Yolov5, and yolov8 for vehicle detection in urban environments in Montería, Colombia’, Future Transportation, 5(4), p. 191. doi:10.3390/futuretransp5040191.
- [10]Zhang, Y. et al. (2022) ‘Real-time vehicle detection based on improved Yolo V5’, Sustainability, 14(19), p. 12274. doi:10.3390/su141912274.
- [11]Li, A. et al. (2023) ‘A multi-scale traffic object detection algorithm for road scenes based on improved Yolov5’, Electronics, 12(4), p. 878. doi:10.3390/electronics12040878.
- [12]Zhao, Z. et al. (2025) ‘Research on the construction of real-time vehicle detection model based on Yolov8-BASW’, IEEE Access, 13, pp. 183519–183533. doi:10.1109/access.2025.3625088.
- [13]You, L. et al. (2024) ‘Multi-object vehicle detection and tracking algorithm based on improved yolov8 and ByteTrack’, Electronics, 13(15), p. 3033. doi:10.3390/electronics13153033.
- [14]Nguyen Thi Thanh Thuy et al. (2026) ‘An integrated approach for multi-object detection and tracking in traffic monitoring using yolov9c and ByteTrack’, Journal of Technical Education Science, 21(01), pp. 81–90. doi:10.54644/jte.2026.2077.
- [15]Yolov10: Real-time end-to-end object detection (no date) Ultralytics Docs. Available at: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov10 (Accessed: 11 May 2026).
- [16]Wang, C.-Y. and Liao, H.-Y.M. (2024) ‘Yolov1 to yolov10: The fastest and most accurate real-time object detection systems’, APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 13(1), pp. 1–38. doi:10.1561/116.20240058.
- [17]Dai, Z. et al. (2024) ‘Enhanced object detection in autonomous vehicles through LIDAR—camera sensor fusion’, World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(7), p. 297. doi:10.3390/wevj15070297.
- [18]Kang, J. et al. (2025) ‘Collaborative real-time single-object anomaly detection framework of roadside facilities for traffic safety and management using efficient Yolo’, Applied Sciences, 15(20), p. 11139. doi:10.3390/app152011139.
