ARIMA-GARCH and ARIMA-EGARCH-t Models in Fitting and Forecasting Volatility of the Shanghai Composite Index
Main Article Content
Keywords
Shanghai composite index, GARCH model, EGARCH model, fitting, forecasting
Abstract
Stock market volatility lies at the heart of risk management. Existing research indicates that A-share returns exhibit fat-tail characteristics, yet further refinement is required in balancing the model’s depiction of fat tails and asymmetry with predictive robustness. This paper utilises daily data from the Shanghai Composite Index spanning January 2010 to June 2025 as its sample. It compares the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average-Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (1,1)-Normal (ARIMA-GARCH (1,1)-Normal) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average-Exponential Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (1,1)-t (ARIMA-EGARCH (1,1)-t) models in terms of volatility fitting and forecasting performance. Methodologically, the mean correlation was first filtered using ARIMA (2,0,2). Maximum likelihood estimation was employed for modelling, with performance evaluated through rolling forecasts. The research encompasses sequence stationarity testing and model construction, evaluating in-sample fit through metrics such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and log-likelihood values. Out-of-sample forecasting performance is measured using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Quantile Likelihood (QLIKE) values. The results indicate that the EGARCH-t model exhibits superior in-sample fit with a higher log-likelihood value (10,606.9), successfully capturing fat tails (ν=4.7236) and the leverage effect (γ=-0.0216). However, the GARCH model demonstrated greater robustness in out-of-sample forecasting, with lower error metrics such as MSE (0.000000) and RMSE (0.000523). Research indicates that model selection requires balancing goodness-of-fit with generalizability, while EGARCH-t is well-suited for capturing historical volatility mechanisms, GARCH holds greater predictive utility.
References
- Chen, X. and Yang, H., (2003). VaR-APARCH model and quantitative analysis of securities investment risk. Chinese Journal of Management Science, no. 1, pp. 22-27.
- CSMAR, (n.d.). Domestic index daily quotes file (Shanghai Composite Index data. 2025-08-12) [Online]. Available: www.csmar.com [Accessed 24 December 2025].
- Han, Y., (2021). Volatility analysis of the Shanghai Composite Index based on the asymmetric GARCH-MIDAS model. Statistics and Decision Making, vol. 37, no. 24, pp. 157-160.
- Lama, A., Jha, G. K., Paul, R. K. and Gurung, B., (2015). Modelling and forecasting of price volatility: an application of GARCH and EGARCH models §. Agricultural Economics Research Review, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 73-82.
- Lin, Y., Xiao, Y. and Li, F., (2020). Forecasting crude oil price volatility via a HM-EGARCH model. Energy Economics, vol. 87, p. 104693.
- Nong, X., (2020). Forecasting the Shanghai Composite Index and portfolio investment research based on ARIMA and GARCH models. Master’s Thesis, Hunan University.
- Shi, H., You, Z. and Chen, Z., (2014). Analysis and forecasting of the Shanghai Composite Index using ARIMA models based on wavelet analysis. Practice and Understanding of Mathematics, vol. 44, no. 23, pp. 66-72.
- Wang, T. Y. and Huang, Z., (2012). High-frequency volatility modeling: Realized GARCH model based on heavy-tailed distributions. Journal of Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 149-161.
- Wang, Y., Xiang, Y., Lei, X. and Zhou, Y., (2022). Volatility analysis based on GARCH-type models: Evidence from the Chinese stock market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 2530-2554.
- Xu, L., (2001). Empirical study on the steady-state characteristics of stock returns in the Chinese stock market. Financial Research, no. 6, pp. 36-43.
- Zhou, Z., (2004). Comparative study on the volatility forecasting capabilities of GARCH models based on different distribution assumptions for the Shanghai Composite Index. Value Engineering, no. 3, pp. 70-72.
