The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Corporate ESG Performance

Main Article Content

Keqi Zhang

Keywords

digital inclusive finance, corporate ESG performance, digitalization level

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the “dual carbon” goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, the advancement of sustainability disclosure regimes, the convergence of ISSB standards with domestic frameworks, the expansion of green investment and financing, and the normalization of supply chain due diligence, firms are facing increasing external pressures in capital markets. Enhancing ESG performance has become a critical pathway to sustainable development, playing a key role in reducing financing costs, strengthening innovation capacity, and improving corporate resilience. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2020 to 2023, this study combines the Peking University Digital Inclusive Finance Index with firm-level ESG data to construct a panel fixed-effects model, examining the impact of digital inclusive finance on corporate ESG performance and conducting heterogeneity analyses across industries. The results show that digital inclusive finance significantly improves corporate ESG performance. Both coverage breadth and usage depth exert important effects by promoting ESG-related innovation, thereby enhancing firms’ environmental, social, and governance performance. These findings remain robust across a series of robustness checks. Moreover, the effects exhibit significant heterogeneity across industries. Based on these findings, this study suggests further strengthening digital financial infrastructure and institutional frameworks, implementing differentiated policies across regions and industries, and guiding firms and regions toward a virtuous interaction between financing and technological development, so as to jointly advance ESG transformation and high-quality economic growth.

Abstract 11 | PDF Downloads 4

References

  • [1] Zhou, F. Z., Pan, W. Y. and Fu, H. ESG responsibility performance of listed companies and institutional investors' shareholding preference. Scientific Decision Making. 2020(11), pp. 15-41. https://doi.org/10.3773/j.issn.1006-4885.2020.11.015.
  • [2] Guo, F., Wang, J. Y., Wang, F., Kong, T., Zhang, X. and Cheng, Z. Y. Measuring China's digital financial inclusion: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly. 2020, 19(4), pp. 1401-1418. https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2020.03.12.
  • [3] Jiao, J. P., Huang, T. T., Wang, T. D., Zhang, S. H. and Wang, Z. The development process and empirical research of inclusive finance in China. Shanghai Finance. 2015(4), pp. 12-22. https://doi.org/10.13910/j.cnki.shjr.2015.04.003.
  • [4] Li, J. J., Peng, Y. C. and Ma, S. C. Inclusive finance and economic development in China: Multidimensional connotation and empirical analysis. Economic Research Journal. 2020, 55(4), pp. 37-52.
  • [5] Liang, B. and Zhang, J. H. Can the development of digital inclusive finance stimulate innovation?: Evidence from Chinese cities and SMEs. Modern Economic Science. 2019, 41(5), pp. 74-86.
  • [6] Fang, X. M. and Hu, D. Corporate ESG performance and innovation: Empirical evidence from a-share listed companies. Economic Research Journal. 2023, 58(2), pp. 91-106.
  • [7] Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review. 1958, 48(3), pp. 261-297.
  • [8] Drempetic, S., Klein, C. and Zwergel, B. The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics. 2020, 167(2), pp. 333-360, http://www.jstor.org/stable/45386660.
  • [9] Wen, Y. d. and Chen, Y. Digital finance and enterprise ESG performance:Effects, mechanisms and“greenwash”test. Statistics & Decision. 2024, 40(1), pp. 142-147. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2024.01.025.
  • [10] Wang, L. L., Lian, Y. H. and Dong, J. Study on the impact mechanism of ESG performance on corporate value. Securities Market Herald. 2022(05), pp. 23-34.