Impact of Energy Transition on Regional Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China

Main Article Content

Yanqin Jiang

Keywords

energy transition, carbon emissions, coupling coordination

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global climate change and China’s commitment to carbon reduction, energy transition has become an important pathway toward low-carbon development. Using panel data from 26 Chinese provinces between 2013 and 2022, this study investigates how regional energy transition affects carbon emissions. An evaluation framework covering three dimensions—cleanliness, security, and efficiency—is constructed, with indicator weights determined through the entropy method. The development levels of the three subsystems are measured and further integrated through a coupling coordination model to assess the overall progress of energy transition and its evolution over time. Regression analysis is then employed to examine the relationship between energy transition and carbon dioxide emissions. The results suggest that China’s energy transition has generally advanced during the study period, although the development of different subsystems remains uneven. The relationship between energy transition and carbon emissions follows an inverted U-shaped pattern. At relatively low levels of transition, carbon emissions continue to increase, whereas the emission-reduction effect becomes more evident as the transition deepens, eventually contributing to a decline in emissions. The impacts are not uniform across regions and differ according to urbanization level, economic development, and coastal–inland location. By examining both the evolution of energy transition and its environmental consequences, this study offers additional evidence on the role of energy transition in reducing carbon emissions and provides implications for region-specific low-carbon development under China’s dual-carbon strategy.

Abstract 32 | PDF Downloads 16

References

  • [1] Khan, M., & Rana, A. T. (2021). Institutional quality and CO2 emission–output relations: The case of Asian countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 111569.
  • [2] Cheng, C., Ren, X., Dong, K., Dong, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111818.
  • [3] Cao, H., Peng, L., Yan, Z., & Xu, J. (2023). Does perfect regional innovation ecosystem curb carbon emissions? A measure based on the niche fitness. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102, 107219.
  • [4] Kabeyi, M. J. B., & Olanrewaju, O. A. (2021). Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9.
  • [5] Slameršak, A., Kallis, G., & O’Neill, D. W. (2022). Energy requirements and carbon emissions for a low-carbon energy transition. Nature Communications, 13(1), 6932.
  • [6] Hou, M. F. (2023). Current situation, challenges, and countermeasures of China’s energy transition and energy security under the carbon neutrality goal. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 45(02), 1-10.
  • [7] Zhang, S., & Chen, W. (2022). China’s energy transition pathway in a carbon neutral vision. Engineering, 14, 64-76.
  • [8] Qin, Y., Zhou, M., Hao, Y., Huang, X., Tong, D., Huang, L., ... & Zhu, T. (2024). Amplified positive effects on air quality, health, and renewable energy under China’s carbon neutral target. Nature Geoscience, 17(5), 411-418.
  • [9] Bouyghrissi, S., Murshed, M., Jindal, A., Berjaoui, A., Mahmood, H., & Khanniba, M. (2022). The importance of facilitating renewable energy transition for abating CO2 emissions in Morocco. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(14), 20752-20767.
  • [10] Perone, G. (2024). The relationship between renewable energy production and CO2 emissions in 27 OECD countries: A panel cointegration and Granger non-causality approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139655.
  • [11] Lau, C. K., Gozgor, G., Mahalik, M. K., Patel, G., & Li, J. (2023). Introducing a new measure of energy transition: Green quality of energy mix and its impact on CO2 emissions. Energy Economics, 122, 106702.
  • [12] Wang, S., Li, G., & Fang, C. (2018). Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2144-2159.
  • [13] Lin, S., Wang, S., Marinova, D., Zhao, D., & Hong, J. (2017). Impacts of urbanization and real economic development on CO2 emissions in non-high income countries: Empirical research based on the extended STIRPAT model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 952-966.
  • [14] Wang, Q., & Zhang, F. (2021). The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth–evidence from 182 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123838.
  • [15] Jiang, H. S., & Sun, M. X. (2021). Carbon emission rights trading, industrial structure and regional emission reduction. Modern Economic Investigation, (11), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.13891/j.cnki.mer.2021.11.008.
  • [16] Niu, W. Y. (2014). Three elements of sustainable development theory. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 29(04), 410-415.
  • [17] Lyu, B. Y., Chen, Y. X., & Zhan, J. N. (2022). Government budget management, tax collection behavior and firm operating efficiency. Economic Research Journal, 57(08), 58-77.
  • [18] Boot, T., Niccodemi, G., & Wansbeek, T. (2023). Unbiased estimation of the OLS covariance matrix when the errors are clustered. Empirical Economics, 64(6), 2511-2533.
  • [19] Han, W., Yuan, F., Wang, C., Luan, D., & Wang, H. (2023). The impact of carbon risk on real earnings management. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3).