Research on Hetero-Cultural Translation Strategies in the Spanish Version of The Three-Body Problem from the Perspective of Cultural Translation Theory
Main Article Content
Keywords
cultural translation theory, The Three-Body Problem, Spanish translation, hetero-culture, translation strategies, cross-cultural communication
Abstract
Literary translation involves more than linguistic conversion; it also entails the reconstruction and re-encoding of cultural meanings. From the perspective of cultural translation theory, this study takes Liu Cixin’s original Chinese novel The Three-Body Problem and its Spanish translation El problema de los tres cuerpos by Javier Altayó as the objects of analysis. Drawing on Nida’s framework of cultural classification, culturally embedded elements in the source text are grouped into five categories: ecological, material, social, religious-philosophical, and linguistic. Through a comparative reading of the Chinese and Spanish versions, the paper examines the translator’s shifting strategies among foreignization, domestication, and cultural negotiation. The analysis suggests that the translation does not rely on a single or fixed strategy. When dealing with culture-specific elements that carry strong historical or regional specificity, the translator is more likely to preserve foreignness through transliteration, literal translation, or brief explanatory additions. In contrast, for expressions that may hinder comprehension or lead to cultural misinterpretation, freer rendering, generalization, or contextual adjustment tend to be adopted in order to reduce the cognitive burden on target readers. Overall, the Spanish translation of The Three-Body Problem reveals a flexible negotiation process, in which cultural difference is retained to varying degrees while comprehension is facilitated and narrative flow is maintained. This case offers a useful reference for the Spanish dissemination of Chinese science fiction and more broadly for the cross-cultural transmission of heterogenous cultural elements.
References
- [1] Cao, X. Z., & He, M. X. (2025). A study on the dissemination and acceptance of The Three-Body Problem in Spanish-speaking regions. China Editor, (11), 92-98.
- [2] Xie, T. Z. (2006). After the “cultural turn” of translation studies: The comparative literature significance of the cultural turn in translation studies. Comparative Literature in China, (03), 1-14.
- [3] Xu, J. (2003). On Translation [Translation theory]. Hubei Education Press.
- [4] Liu, Y. H. (2021). Re-discussing heterogeneity and translation stance. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University (Social Sciences Edition), (03), 72-80.
- [5] Nida, E. A. (1945). Linguistics and ethnology in translation-problems. WORD, 1(2), 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/2140028X.1945.11811794
- [6] Bassnett, S., & Lefevere, A. (1990). Translation, History and Culture. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
- [7] Venuti, L. (1995). The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. Routledge.
- [8] Yang, M. (2006). Contextual adaptation and cultural translation. Foreign Language Education, (03), 87-89.
- [9] Duan, F. (2008). The third type of translation and the third culture: Literary translation and the transmission of cultural heterogeneity. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University, 24(06), 84-87.
- [10] Bao, T. F. (2005). Philosophical speculation on the definition of “localization” acceptance of heterogeneous culture in intercultural translation. Shanghai Journal of Translators, (04), 47-50.
- [11] Yu, T. B., & Chen, L. M. (2025). The evolution of “Yuan” (affinity) and the pluralism and coordination of its translation methods. China Terminology, 27(6), 149-154.
- [12] Liu, C. X. (2008). The Three-body Problem. Chongqing Publishing House.
- [13] Liu, C. X. (2016). El problema de los tres cuerpos [The three-body problem] (J. Altayó, Trans.). Nova.
